Sunday

There’s this mystical aura surrounding Sundays. Probably because of my vivid memories of groaning as I begrudgingly dragged myself out of bed early on Sunday, only to succumb to my mother’s dutiful devotion and head to church. Making my way to bathroom with an oscillating gait, a mixed sense of hopefulness and spite was shaken up by the babble of voices coming from the kitchen. It was the talk of the day. My mother and aunt were comparing their braciole recipes. Even though this had already been discussed the week before, and irregardless of their life-long blood bond, it was incumbent for them to settle on their culinary differences every Sunday morning at approximately 9:30. My mom compensates the sacrilegious, unspoken garlic-ban with tons of pine nuts and cheese, “You know I can’t use garlic in this house”.

My dad would have easily rather chopped his own arm than smelled, tasted or even remotely thought of something garlic-flavored. It was the closest thing to a phobia I’ve ever seen him experience. Years later he got a rare form of cancer in his olfactory gland and was told that his sense of smell and taste would be affected dramatically. Can you guess the only thing he can, unexplainably, still smell? Not flowers, not cat piss, not cologne. Garlic.

“You could make a separate sauce for him, you know?” I chimed in, attempting to assuage the heated debate but expecting a disruption. Walking into the kitchen was a sensorial experience my half-asleep child-self had so been accustomed to that years later, in a state of mid-wakefulness in another home, I was struck by a spark of longing. The smell of pork meat in a rich tomato sauce bath, the sight of the steamed-up kitchen windows from the hours of laborious cooking, the unquestioned presence of family members with their unsolicited opinions, and its overall feeling of unhurried planning and pacing was replaced by… silence. The silence of being somewhere new, somewhere unknown, on a Sunday hits different.

“It is what it is” – she killed my attempt to stir things up before it even saw the light of day. She was right – Sunday is what it is, and how dare I try to spoil its rituals. Sunday is sacred. Maybe that’s why, despite our creative differences, church didn’t hurt so bad. Not sleeping in, not going to play with my friends, not finally experiencing the freedom of an unscheduled school-less morning, and instead going to stand (and occasionally sit, then stand, then sit again) in a nave that smelled like piss and incense, filled with chanting strangers and rambunctious children was the ultimate, indisputable sacrifice for the ritual. The only known reasonable way to earn my Sunday feast and devour it greedily and unceremoniously – the Jesus way.

I’ve realized my God-less and church-less adult life has been an ongoing chase of rituals. However far I am from home, however long it takes to achieve the desired density of that sauce without that brand of tomato sauce, and whomever I am surrounded by, I know that in those moments I am conjuring up the same ceremonious, prescribed order of actions that once made me feel part of something without having to doubt it, without having to doubt me. A place where I can always find what I need because everything is where it’s supposed to be, where I can lay my whirlwind of chaos to rest and become a creature of habit.

A home.

Past, Present Lives – reflections from someone who stays, Part 1

Two days ago, I finally got around to watching Past Lives, a movie I had been eagerly anticipating for the past year and a half. Contrary to my first post, this will not be a review. Past Lives is a movie that is so intimately connected to me that any attempt to qualify it under the metric of analysis might be a disservice to my experience of it.

The movie breathed tenderness and vividness of authenticity within the realm of my experiences; it was as though the story was being woven within the tapestry of my life as I was watching it unfold, and all the efforts to be resistant to it were met with a reassuring look, like an invitation to continue watching fearlessly and trustfully.

But it was never forceful. This is a movie that speaks its truth unassumingly, almost in a self-effacing manner. It is no Before Trilogy or Eternal Sunshine (which I love). Past Lives lets its characters breathe and contemplate hard topics like fate, destiny, happenstance, cultural and linguistic differences, in a place of such delicacy and quietude that you can’t help but wanting to inhabit that space and find comfort in there too. Personally, I found myself fully immersed in this tranquil realm, allowing my thoughts to roam freely.

I have decided to share some of them here.

Most of my adult life, I was sure there were two Marcos coexisting within me. Upon my old therapist’s suggestion, we’ll call them Marco and Mark. Marco was born and raised in Naples, Italy while Mark spent most of his adult life in other countries, away from home. Because of the different environments where they respectively existed and grew, they both had a distinctive personality, spoke a different language, behaved differently socially, at times thought differently, and even had different ambitions.

I began ruminating on these often contradicting aspects of my personality when the relationship I was in started to lose its groove, very quickly became stagnant and eventually ended for no apparent reason. I had been telling myself that I was in love and there was no clear sight of why we were breaking up so why did I start doubting how much of me was in the relationship, which parts of me really felt that love I was professing, and which Marco was really exerting it?

Then, Covid happened. I was forced to come back home and grapple with feelings of uncertainty, anxiety and loss, just like the rest of the world. However, unlike most people who felt forlorn and longing to connect with friends and their external world, I found solace in looking inward and attempting to reconcile the parts of me I had thought were separate. My inquisitive nature was at its fullest here, and I was adamant to get to the bottom of this matter. In an effort to ascertain which salient life experience belonged to which Marco, I started visualizing Marco and Mark as two big puzzles, each having their own qualities. Soon hundreds of puzzle pieces were picked out and assigned to one of the two me’s. Which one was angry at that kid for throwing the ball in his face? Which one was mad at his dad? Which one got a degree? Which one got a teaching qualification? Which one fell in love for the first time? Which one moved to Spain? And so on..

Nevertheless, despite my concerted efforts to make sense of it all, I soon realized that I was wrongfully applying an unhelpful lens to this investigation, which not only did not reunify the separation, but it also exacerbated it. In other words, I was still seeing the two me’s as two separate people, and that was not my goal.

So, where was I now? In addition to the newfound glee of living in post-isolation community, sharing experiences with my loved ones outdoors, dating again, I started feeling this sense of long-lost belonging to my roots which provided me with a salve for my existential doubts: a new, yet unfamiliar peace of mind. The world was opening up, and so was I.

Shortly after, I left for USA.

Leaving again was not approached without a great deal of disconcertment. I thought I had found my peace, my place and my reason to be where I was… at home. I was not ready to follow Mark’s ambition. But I did because the opportunity to experience something so big was too enticing to pass on. Much like my other experiences abroad, I knew adapting to a new country and customs was going to be a relatively easeful endeavor. Luckily, the number of lives abroad had made me acutely aware of social customs and how to behave in foreign settings, so oftentimes my life in USA was like following a script. A charming, exhilarating, fun, wild script. And I loved it. After almost two years, I was exceptionally comfortable in my new life, so much so that I was able to convince both Mark, Marco and everyone around them that I was living my most truthful self, in my most comfortable space, my new home away from home.

But was I?

Ants

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about structure. My whole life I’ve always had a sense of ambivalence to it, oscillating between yearning for it and rejecting it. I’m sure many can relate to this sentiment: growing up, I wanted to be a part of my world but I also viscerally resented it for not quite getting me. It was like trying on different clothes that would never fit right.

As an adult, I am aware of the roles I play in the systems I navigate, but I have kept my urge to resist and redefine. I began wondering if and how my efforts to resist or embrace certain systems actually shaped my identity. During this introspection, I fortuitously stumbled upon the realm of complexity theory.

According to complexity theory1, we are all part of a system that self-regulates. Think, for instance, of a colony of ants. We often see them laboring collectively in their marching journey, communicating through their antennas to smell pheromones that enable them to instantly become aware of their colony activity. It’s a perfectly functioning society where major effort is put into the well-being and organization of its system, maximizing time and space to take care of dump refuse, corpses, food. 

When you look at an ant colony from a top-down scale, it may be identifiable as a unity, as one moving black line on the ground. But on a closer look, you will see that it is made up of dozens of individual ants that optimize their surrounding space to maximize their effort for the benefit of their most immediate neighboring ants. At this level of scale, it’s an organizational, self-regulating system made up of individuals that organize and self-regulate. 

Let’s try to give this a closer look and observe one ant under a microscope. Unsurprisingly, we would find that an ant is nothing but an agglomerate of cellular systems that are in turn observable in even smaller scales: molecular, atomical, sub-atomical etc. Each of these systems is an organizational entity that generates order and behavior in relation to their environment. 

Now take this analogy and apply it to an aerial view of people walking up a flight of stairs in a metro station. The first organizational system is a predictable line moving from A to B, just like a colony of ants. On a smaller scale, you observe individual people who are aware of their surroundings and maximize effort, time, and space to reach their goal – for example, by not bumping into other people, stepping their feet onwards, holding onto the handrail.

On an even smaller scale, we would see that one person is made up of trillions of billions of cells, interacting with one another in a self-regulated behavior. The scale can be further broken down into microscopic parts of the cell to observe molecules, atoms, electrons, neutrons, protons. Remember where else you can find these systems? In every other person in the world. In every living being. In every matter. In every planet and star that has ever existed. In the whole universe.

In other words, the vastity of the microscopic system is the same as the macroscopic one. 

Take, for instance, a sunflower. Its essence is directly conditioned by its nest of relationships with its own parts, the petals, the stem, the seeds, as well as with all the other systems that interact with it, such as the bees that pollinate it, the sun, the rain, the soil, the seasons. Take each of these systems into an observable microscopic and macroscopic part and look at all the universes that are synchronously intertwined. Without this interaction, there is no sunflower. It exists because of it.

Evidently, we can’t be identifiable as one single thing. We are a multitude of moving systems that are constantly interacting with each other. Not only are we in relation with the myriad outward systems that exist in our world, but we also are them. In short, we are not part of the universe, we are the universe.

But, why does this all even matter? 

When we take out an organism away from its vital interactions, it becomes objectifiable and exploitable. A sunflower will have a relatively short life on your kitchen table. 

Imagine taking this philosophy and applying it to every system you know: yourself, your relationships, your family, your local community. We exist because of them, so what efforts are we making to secure natural order within these vital connections?

Now, think of a political party who is singling out minorities, limiting their rights, damaging their nest of relationships; disabling actions to protect our biosphere and ultimately damaging the foundation of our healthy existence. What efforts are they making? At the expense of what?

When I was reading up on complexity theory, the concept of quenched disorder stood out to me. Within the world of ant colonies, you may observe the presence of a few divergent ants that deviate from the collective path after a disruption. At first glance, these individuals may appear aimless, lost. Nevertheless, it is these divergent ants that possess the unique ability to navigate through unexpected disorders, efficiently discovering alternative food sources for the whole colony.

Divergent ants represent those who possess a unique and creative spirit, those who strive to bring order and meaning in the midst of chaos. They are the artists, the creators, and the visionaries who dare to make sense of the world around us.

They are you, and me.

  1. These concepts have been taken from the work on Complexity Theory by Dr. Neil Theise ↩︎

Barbie – my review

For a gay kid with mostly girl cousins, you can imagine my experience with Barbie was quite… personal. Yes, I dreamt of owning my Barbie (the Happy Holidays one was my favorite) but I think there was more to it. Sometimes, when I would find myself playing with my cousins and their dolls, making them reenact the most imaginative scenarios, I truly felt like I was part of their world. At times, more so than wanting to own one, I wished I was a Barbie. As a gay kid with a straight older brother though, I was also fascinated by monsters, big cars, machines, and just anything with a gear. As a result of this duality, I would usually force myself to justify that I liked Barbies because, well, for sure I must have been sexually attracted to the female figure. Cut to me fully undressing a Ken doll to gently caress the edges of his perfectly muscular body with my fingertips and feeling a tingle down there. But sure yeah, I loved Barbie’s boobs. 

Fast forward to 25 something years later, I’m at the movies with my boyfriend about to watch Barbie and the hype is through the roof. I don’t remember the last time there was this much anticipation around a movie. I am aware of the pre-production and production process, the grandiose marketing campaign, but I intentionally restrained from watching full-length trailers, clips, or reading extensive information about it. I wanted to be surprised and reward myself for exercising such self-control.

The first 30 minutes of the film masterfully succeeded in drawing me back into the world of pink galore that is Barbie Land, with the addition of a few cinematic tricks narrated by Lizzo and Helen Mirren that just made it all even more exhilarating. This is a movie that will require more watchful views in order to get a full grasp on the sheer magnitude of its production design, which is deservedly already creating Oscar buzz. But it is a gut-punching moment in the first act that abruptly breaks a conspicuously flamboyant and colorful musical number, sucking all the cheer from it and kickstarting a major narrative flip, reminding me: this is a Greta Gerwig screenplay. It’s a bombshell question Stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) throws at her plastic girlfriends, cueing a gasp from everyone inside and outside the screen:

Do you guys ever think about dying?

My jaw drops, I adjust myself to the chair, fasten an imaginary seatbelt, take a fistful of popcorn, and I am ready for a tumultuous existential ride.

From then on, the movie embarks on a tangential journey that sees Barbie leaving her twirling dream fantasy and attempting to fit in the real world. I am catapulted into a completely different world than the one I created as a kid. Suddenly, Barbie is telling me, that kid, that he would never be her because she’s just like him, like me: directionless, nomadic, fickle, hopeful, childish, and perpetually looking for meaning amid all the chaos. In other words, human.

“Barbie” had the challenging task of pleasing a wide array of audiences, from younger ones who are growing up with tablets and perhaps only familiar with the blond icon thanks to its digitalized version on YouTube, to the generation of mothers and parents who were raised playing with the doll and perhaps reminiscing it with nostalgia, wishing they could jump back in time and still be playful, naïve, creative, unproblematic. Not to mention the ultimate hurdle of speaking also on behalf of Gen Z / Millennials who boosted the feminist movement in the digital era and are certainly not indifferent to the problems that arise from a slim, able-bodied, white, blonde, toy.

Luckily for them, Barbie IS a feminist movie and it does not shy away from underscoring it with self-aggrandizing irony and sarcasm. The gender equity discourse rightfully and predictably permeates the whole movie, almost always hitting the mark with wit and scathing remarks on male dominance, creating absurd war-like scenarios amongst the Kens in an effort to dismantle the Kendom hegemony that did make me wonder whether the movie was benefitting from the Us vs Them narrative or suffering from it. (Side note from my scattered brain: It also made me wonder… Would there even be wars without men? I’ve genuinely thought about this and I think I’ve landed on one answer. The reality is that it’s hard to observe it empirically because of clear lack of evidence of women in military leadership, BUT, there have definitely been tyrannical and brutal women in power over the course of human history (Mary Tutor aka Bloody Mary says hi). My argument is those women might have been trying to act like their male counterparts in order to survive more easefully on account of achieving political power in often merciless, male dominated environments).

Truthfully, no one is indifferent to Barbie. Unfortunately, this underlying intent to make a movie for everyone often resulted in echoing too many voices at once. I found the movie to be quite erratic in its intent to achieve coral emotional depth while simultaneously trying to sustain underdeveloped storylines. There is a premise for a great mother-daughter arc, but it only remains mildly explored through the Barbie lens for the sake of prioritizing less emotionally impactful and more distracting arcs. For instance, the whole Mattel CEO storyline was… pointless? His motives are still somewhat unclear to me, why does Barbie Land even pose a threat to the real world? Why is he so adamantly eager to catch Barbie? That unnecessarily long car chase was such a blatant product placement that I wouldn’t be surprised if everyone involved in the movie was given an electric blue Chevy Blazer. During those scenes I felt like I was watching a Will Ferrell movie, and I didn’t love it. But maybe I only have a problem with Will Ferrell playing the same role over and over.

All in all, Barbie is a visually stunning film that will make you wonder whether you need sunglasses inside. It offers an abundance of sarcastic humor, intellectual jokes, delightful musical numbers and Ruth Handler scenes that steal the show. However, I found there to be some inconsistent narrative choices and underexplored plot lines that prevented the movie from really going “there”. Overall, the enjoyment and the delight were present and I will definitely give it a second (third, fourth…) watch. If this is what it took to get almost everyone on planet Earth back to the theatres (dare I say wishfully creating a new generation of movie-goers?), then I couldn’t be happier the newly humanized Mattel doll came into being in a motion picture to enchant us and make us ponder the meaning of our existence.

For Your Inconsideration

On average, we process 70,000 thoughts and 74 gigabytes of information a day. The time we spend on each piece of information varies, and it’s unclear how the brain qualifies it. 

In our digital age, we are engulfed by informational chaos that unhesitatingly invades our cognitive sphere. Sometimes, we might focus on something for even less than 2 seconds. Other times, something will spark our interest and we might spend 15 seconds processing it, even a couple of minutes if we are absolutely enthralled. We might even begin researching it more, watch related videos, google it, engage with it through sharing and commenting. 

But most of the time, we are completely unbothered and unfazed by what we are exposed to online. Our experience often becomes unconsidered, undoubted. What makes something worthy of our attention? What doesn’t? What deters us from it? I unfortunately can’t answer any of these questions, but For Your Inconsideration hopes to be an example of how I interact with the things I process or don’t process, and whatever fleeting creation my mind generates from it. Hopefully something will spark your interest for at least 15 seconds :).